C
Cyrano Security
14 min read
For equipment lenders, receivers, and secured parties

Under the Personal Property Security Act, a pluggable HDMI box is the cleanest camera-system collateral you can register. The DVR in the closet is not.

Every PPSA explainer on the first page of Google, from Ontario.ca to the CanLII digests to the big firm bulletins from Osler, Blakes, and McCarthy, walks through the same material: registration mechanics, purchase money priority, the affixation test for fixtures, and a short paragraph about how hardwired equipment is a grey zone. None of them apply the test to a modern AI edge device. That is the gap this page fills.

The Cyrano unit occupies exactly one HDMI cable between the DVR and the wall monitor, plus one ethernet cable. No wall penetration. No building power modification. No modification to the DVR. Under PPSA section 34 and UCC section 9-334, that is the physical profile of clean Goods / Equipment collateral, not a fixture. This is the classification worked example that lenders, receivers, and secured parties have been asking for.

See the hardware footprint a PPSA filing can cleanly describe
4.9from 50+ properties
One HDMI cable in, one HDMI cable out, one ethernet cable
No wall penetration, no modification to the DVR, no dedicated circuit
Install under 2 minutes, removal under 30 seconds
Fits PPSA Goods / Equipment, not fixture, on a standard financing statement

What the top-ranking PPSA pages actually explain, and what they skip

Run a search for “personal property security act ppsa” and you will get a consistent shape of results. The Ontario government landing page (Ontario.ca) explains how to register a security interest through the Personal Property Security Registration (PPSR). CanLII and the provincial statute pages give you the text of the PPSA itself, including section 34 on fixtures. The law firm briefings (Osler, Blakes, McCarthy, Stikeman, Dentons) walk through purchase money priority, after-acquired property, and enforcement. The registration service pages (Dye & Durham, ESC Corporate Services, CorporateFilings) describe the mechanics of filing a financing statement.

Every one of those pages is correct, and every one of them stops at the same place: the classification of an actual piece of equipment. The fixture question gets a paragraph of abstract three-part test (degree of annexation, object of annexation, intention) and then moves on. No worked example, no physical description of a specific device, no application of the test to 2026-era hardware like AI edge boxes, smart cameras, or pluggable monitoring devices.

The gap is not academic. It matters the first time a lender has to choose between a fixture filing at the land registry and a straight PPSA financing statement for a piece of security hardware, or the first time a trustee has to classify the same hardware during a receivership, or the first time a landlord claims that an installed AI camera system is part of the premises. For a device shaped like Cyrano, the answer is unambiguous. But someone has to write it down. That is this page.

The affixation test, four steps, applied to a Cyrano unit

PPSA section 34 (Ontario, mirrored across provinces) asks whether a good has become a fixture by the traditional common-law test. UCC section 9-334 imports the same real-property fixture analysis from state law. Run the four steps on an actual device.

Affixation test, step by step, on a Cyrano unit

  1. 1

    Degree of annexation

    Zero. The unit attaches to the real property by one HDMI cable and one ethernet cable, both of which are quick-release consumer connectors. No screws into studs, no conduit, no wall penetration, no dedicated circuit. An average adult can unplug and carry out the entire unit in under 30 seconds.

  2. 2

    Object of annexation

    To better use the goods, not to permanently improve the real property. The unit's function is to process the HDMI multiview that the DVR already produces. Removing the unit does not leave a hole in the wall, a modified circuit, or a DVR that needs reconfiguration. The real property is unchanged by the unit's presence.

  3. 3

    Intention of the parties

    Documented, at the point of sale or lease, as a portable, removable monitoring device that may be relocated to another property at the debtor's option. The purchase order, the lease, and the PPSA filing all describe a Goods / Equipment relationship, not a fixture filing, which is exactly the paper trail a court looks for on the third prong.

  4. 4

    Result under PPSA s.34 / UCC 9-334

    Not a fixture. The unit is Goods, specifically Equipment under the PPSA definitions. A straight PPSA financing statement or UCC-1 perfects the security interest. No fixture filing at the land registry is required. Priority against the mortgagee is governed by the goods priority rules, not by the fixture priority rules.

Why the DVR next to the Cyrano unit is a different question

The secured party finds the Cyrano unit in a closet next to a DVR. The two devices look related. They are not the same under PPSA. Run the four-step affixation test on a standard office-closet DVR and the answers go the other way on every prong: the DVR is rack-mounted or shelf-mounted, is wired into a dedicated 120V receptacle (often on a separate breaker for UPS), has cat cables running through wall penetrations to every camera on the property, and was installed with the documented intent of being permanent building infrastructure.

The secured party financing the DVR is in fixture territory. The secured party financing the Cyrano unit is not. Same closet, different collateral, different filing regime, different priority analysis. That is not a loophole, that is what the PPSA and UCC Article 9 were designed to distinguish.

PPSA classification: one closet, two different collateral types

DVR, rack mounted
Cat cables through walls
Dedicated 120V receptacle
Intended permanent
PPSA s.34 / UCC 9-334
DVR: fixture, land registry filing
Cyrano unit: Goods, PPSA financing statement
Cables: accession to whichever it serves
Software licence: general intangible

The anchor fact: the entire hardware footprint in words

For a PPSA classification argument, specificity beats abstract language every time. Here is the whole physical description of a Cyrano unit as it sits on the property. This is what goes on the collateral schedule.

Anchor fact

Installed footprint, Cyrano edge AI unit, a PPSA classifier can read this out loud

  • One (1) HDMI cable, Cyrano HDMI-in port to the existing HDMI-out port on the DVR that previously fed the wall monitor.
  • One (1) HDMI cable, Cyrano HDMI-out port to the wall monitor. The multiview passes through; the guard or office staff sees the same tiled image they always saw.
  • One (1) ethernet cable, Cyrano RJ45 port to the nearest property network switch.
  • One (1) power adapter, Cyrano barrel jack to an existing 120V convenience receptacle shared with the DVR and monitor. No dedicated circuit, no electrical work, no modification to the panel.
  • Zero wall penetrations. Zero drilling. Zero modification to the DVR hardware. Zero firmware change or configuration change on the DVR. Zero ONVIF, RTSP, or port-forwarding integration. Zero manufacturer cloud binding.
  • Install time: under 2 minutes. Removal time: under 30 seconds. Residual change to real property: none.

Every one of those lines makes the affixation test easier for the court and the secured party. None of them applies to the DVR in the same closet. That is why the two devices are classified differently under the PPSA even though they are six feet apart.

Sample collateral description for the PPSA financing statement or UCC-1

Specific goods description, serial numbered, located at a named property. That is the tight shape lenders and their counsel should use. Blanket language invites fights.

collateral_description.txt

A receiver, a trustee, or a mortgagee reading that schedule gets an immediate picture of the physical asset and an immediate signal that the secured party considered the fixture question. The “FIXTURE FILING REQUIRED: No” line and the reason recital are not legally necessary, but they cut hours of back-and-forth out of any later dispute.

Classification side by side: Cyrano unit vs. the DVR it taps, vs. the cameras it reads

Same property, three pieces of hardware, three different PPSA classifications. A lender doing all three should split the collateral into three filings, not roll them into one.

FeatureDVR / camerasCyrano unit
Degree of physical annexationRack mount, cat cables through walls, dedicated receptacleOne HDMI cable, one ethernet cable, one power adapter
Wall penetrationYes, for cat runs to every cameraNone
Building power modificationFrequent, often dedicated circuit for UPSNone, shares existing convenience receptacle
Modification to adjacent hardwareDVR reconfigures cameras on the PoE switchNone, DVR is untouched
Removal timeHours, cable pulls and cap patchesUnder 30 seconds
PPSA s.34 classificationTypically fixture, depends on install patternGoods, specifically Equipment
Correct filing venueFixture filing at land registry plus PPSAPPSA financing statement only (or UCC-1 only)
Priority vs. prior mortgageeGoverned by fixture priority rules (PPSA s.34(4)+, UCC 9-334)Governed by goods priority rules, not fixture
Enforcement on defaultCoordinate with real property enforcementSelf-help repossession on 30 seconds of cable work
Trustee classification in bankruptcyUsually real property, subject to disputeFF&E / Equipment, clean

Enforcement, what the repossession actually looks like

The PPSA repossession right (Ontario s.62, UCC 9-609) lets a secured party take possession without judicial process if they can do so without a breach of the peace. The physical shape of the Cyrano unit makes that easy. Three cables and a power plug, two minutes, done. The DVR keeps writing to its own disks, so the property is not left uncovered.

enforcement_log.txt (secured party on-site repossession)

A receiver or secured party taking possession of hardwired fixtures at the same property has a very different day. They are coordinating with the mortgagee, they may need leave of the court, and they are probably leaving the cameras and the DVR behind because the cost of removing them is higher than the collateral value. The Cyrano unit is the part of the collateral that comes out clean.

Five collateral scenarios a PPSA-shaped Cyrano deal solves

Actual situations equipment lenders and secured parties described to us while we were sharpening the collateral description. Each one turns on the goods versus fixture classification.

Equipment lease financing a portfolio of 40 properties

Lessor wants one PPSA filing per province, serial numbers listed, units portable between properties at the lessee's option. A fixture filing at 40 land registries would kill the deal economics. Cyrano's physical shape makes goods classification defensible.

Secured lender behind a prior-recorded mortgage

If the camera hardware is a fixture, the mortgagee wins on priority unless the lender made a fixture filing in time. Cyrano classified as goods sidesteps the priority fight entirely.

Receiver carving the estate

Receiver needs a fast triage of what is real property vs. FF&E. Cyrano unit goes to FF&E on a glance, with a clean PPSA or UCC filing as the evidentiary backstop.

Commercial tenant default, landlord lien claim

Landlord claims an installed system is part of the premises. Hardwired DVR is a close call. Cyrano unit is not; a prior-perfected PPSA or UCC-1 wins, and the unit comes out with the secured party.

Cross-border portfolio, Canada and US

Same hardware, PPSA in Ontario and UCC-1 in the US. Because the device has the same portable, non-affixed physical shape in both jurisdictions, the classification is consistent and the filings travel.

What a tight PPSA deal file on a Cyrano unit looks like

If you are lender counsel or in-house at an equipment finance shop, here is the minimum viable checklist we use. Everything on this list is specifically shaped by the physical facts of the device.

Lender counsel: Cyrano PPSA file, minimum viable

  • Purchase order or lease schedule with serial number of each Cyrano unit
  • Property address where each unit is currently installed (for location clause)
  • Collateral description: Goods / Equipment, not fixture, with cable and power-adapter accessions
  • Recital of non-affixation facts: no wall penetration, no dedicated circuit, no DVR modification
  • Right to relocate unit to another property without re-execution (so the unit stays clean Goods)
  • Register PPSA financing statement at the relevant provincial PPR (or file UCC-1 in the US)
  • Do NOT make a fixture filing at the land registry for the unit itself
  • Separately consider, and file if financed, the DVR and camera hardware (that is a fixture question)
  • Notice-of-default language referencing self-help repossession under PPSA s.62 / UCC 9-609
  • Landlord waiver or access agreement, short form, since the unit is in a commercial closet

Numbers that matter to the classification argument

All of these are physical properties of the device, not marketing claims. Each one cuts the affixation test a particular way.

0 minInstall time, cable work only
0 secRemoval time on default
0Wall penetrations on install
0Modifications to the DVR
Max tiles per unit
0
One Cyrano unit is one collateral item
Hardware cost per unit
$0
Clean collateral value on the financing statement
Dedicated circuits
0
Degree of annexation: minimal
Fixture filings required
0
PPSA financing statement only

Jurisdictions this classification travels cleanly through

The affixation test is substantially consistent across the PPSA provinces, the US UCC Article 9 states, and the closest Commonwealth analogues. The physical shape of the unit does not change when the borrower moves portfolios across borders. The filings do.

Ontario PPSAAlberta PPSABritish Columbia PPSASaskatchewan PPSAQuebec Civil Code (hypothec)UCC Article 9 (all US states)Australia PPSA 2009New Zealand PPSA 1999

Classification narrative, frame by frame

The argument a lender's counsel walks through the first time they classify a Cyrano unit. Five frames, five decisions.

Counsel's PPSA classification walk-through

01 / 05

Frame 1, identify the device

Cyrano edge AI unit, serial numbered, in a commercial or multifamily closet next to an existing DVR. No ambiguity about what it is.
1

A single PPSA financing statement with a serial-numbered Cyrano unit and a location clause perfects the lender's position without a single fixture filing at the land registry.

Working collateral description reviewed with equipment finance counsel

Walk a PPSA classification with us on an actual unit

15 minute call. We put a Cyrano unit on a live DVR, walk the cables on camera, and show you the exact collateral description your financing statement or UCC-1 should use.

Book a call

Frequently asked questions

Is this page about the Canadian PPSA, or the US UCC Article 9, or both?

Both, because the classification question is the same question in both systems. Under the Ontario Personal Property Security Act s.34 (and the mirror sections in the other provincial PPSAs), goods lose PPSA status and start being governed by real property law if they are affixed to land in a way that makes them a fixture. Under UCC section 9-334, fixtures live in a priority regime where a purchase money security interest has to be perfected by a fixture filing at the county real property records, not the state UCC-1 index, to beat a mortgagee. A device that is physically pluggable, non-affixed, and portable avoids the whole fixture analysis in both systems. That is what the Cyrano unit is, and that is why it shows up cleanly on a PPSA financing statement or a UCC-1 without any s.34 or 9-334 footnotes.

Why is a DVR at risk of being called a fixture while a Cyrano unit is not?

Because of how each one is physically installed. A typical office-closet DVR or NVR is rack-mounted or shelf-mounted, wired into a dedicated 120V receptacle (sometimes on a separate breaker), has cat cables running through wall penetrations to every camera at the property, and is often the only thing plugged into the PoE switch that feeds the whole camera tree. Courts applying the affixation test (degree of annexation, object of annexation, intention to make permanent) frequently land on 'fixture' for installations like that. Cyrano has the opposite physical footprint: it sits inline on ONE HDMI cable between the DVR and the wall monitor, plus ONE ethernet drop. No wall penetrations, no dedicated circuits, no modification to the building or to the DVR. Unplugging it in 30 seconds leaves zero trace on the real property. Under every affixation test we have seen published, that is personal property.

My client financed the entire camera system at a multifamily property, including the DVR. How do I perfect the security interest?

Split the collateral. The cameras and the DVR, because they are cabled into walls and in some cases hardwired to building power, are realistically fixtures for PPSA s.34 or UCC section 9-334 purposes, so file a fixture filing at the land registry and serve notice on the mortgagee. The Cyrano unit, because it is HDMI pluggable and portable, belongs on a standard PPSA financing statement or UCC-1 as Goods / Equipment, with the serial number. At default, your enforcement rights on the Cyrano unit are clean: you take possession on 30 seconds of HDMI reseating and walk out. Your enforcement rights on the cabled cameras and DVR are messier, because the mortgagee has priority under the fixture rules unless you perfected as a fixture security interest before the mortgage attached.

The borrower has filed for bankruptcy. The trustee is sorting FF&E from real property. Where does the Cyrano device land?

In the FF&E pile, every time. The affixation test for fixtures is physical and intentional. The Cyrano unit is installed with zero physical modification to the real property, is plainly portable, and has a retained serial number that maps to the PPSA financing statement or UCC-1. Trustees and receivers treat it the same way they treat a POS terminal, a laptop, or a keybox: it comes out with the equipment lender, not the mortgagee. The DVR in the same office closet is a harder call and depends on whether the property was financed as a building with the camera system included or whether the camera system was financed separately with a perfected fixture filing.

What is the actual physical footprint of a Cyrano unit on the property, for a PPSA classification argument?

One HDMI cable spliced into the existing HDMI-out port on the DVR that feeds the wall monitor. One HDMI cable from the Cyrano unit to the wall monitor (the signal passes through, so the guard or office sees the same multiview they always saw). One ethernet cable from the Cyrano unit to the property network. Nothing else. No wall penetration, no drilling, no conduit, no dedicated circuit, no building power modification, no DVR firmware change, no DVR configuration change, no ONVIF or RTSP integration, no port forwarding, no manufacturer cloud binding. Installation is under 2 minutes. Removal is under 30 seconds. That is the literal collateral description you put on the PPSA financing statement and the UCC-1.

How does the device know which camera feed is which? Is that tied to the DVR in any way that could affect its PPSA classification?

No. Cyrano reads the HDMI multiview that the DVR is already sending to the wall monitor. It runs a vision pipeline on the tiled output, masks the DVR-rendered overlays (clock, camera-name strip, channel bug), classifies each tile, and writes nine-field event records to its own dashboard. The DVR never receives a command, never gets configured, and has no record that anything is tapped, because the HDMI out is a one-way signal. Every piece of software value lives on the Cyrano unit and the Cyrano dashboard, both of which are the secured party's collateral, not the real property owner's equipment. The PPSA argument is clean: the DVR is the debtor's (or landlord's) property, the Cyrano unit and its software licence are separate collateral, and nothing about the tap creates an intermingling problem.

If we repossess the Cyrano unit on default, does the property lose its security recording?

No. That is important for the lender and for the debtor, because it shapes the enforcement analysis. The DVR's own disks keep writing the way they always did. Removing the Cyrano unit means removing the indexed event log and the dashboard access, not the underlying camera recordings. For the secured party, that means taking possession does not strand the property in a no-coverage state that would trigger insurance or lender-side objections. For the debtor, it means the core legal-duty-of-care recording is preserved even if the indexed layer is repossessed. That clean separation is part of why a PPSA security interest in a Cyrano unit behaves more like a POS terminal lien than a fixture lien.

What should the collateral description on the PPSA financing statement or UCC-1 actually say?

Specific goods description, not a blanket. Something like: 'One Cyrano edge AI video-indexing unit, model [model], serial number [sn], including power supply, HDMI pass-through cable, and ethernet cable, together with all replacements, upgrades, and accessions thereto, and all software licences, logs, and event data produced by such unit, located at [property address].' Specifically listing the serial number and the location keeps the filing tight, preserves priority against a later after-acquired filing, and avoids any argument that the collateral is part of the building. Some lenders also add a short recital that the unit is portable, HDMI-only, and non-affixed, which is not legally required but gives a receiver or trustee a fast answer if classification is ever challenged.

Does provincial PPSA (Ontario, Alberta, BC, Quebec hypothec) change the analysis?

The underlying affixation test is substantially the same across the PPSA provinces, and the practical classification of the Cyrano unit (Goods, specifically Equipment) is the same. Registration mechanics differ, though. Ontario uses PPSR online registration under the PPSA, Alberta and BC use their provincial PPRs. Quebec uses the RDPRM and a hypothec instead of a security interest, and the equivalent of the affixation test lives in the Civil Code articles on immovables by destination. For a Quebec property, the argument is the same in substance: a plug-in HDMI device with no wall penetration is not an immovable by destination. Cross-provincial portfolios should file per-province for the location of each unit.

We lease the devices to the property owner instead of financing a sale. Does that change anything?

True leases over one year and PPSA-deemed leases (even short leases in the lease of goods business) are captured by the PPSA and need to be registered, even though title does not transfer. That is Section 3 of the Ontario PPSA. The same good physical properties that make the Cyrano unit clean sale collateral make it clean lease collateral: the lessor can repossess in 30 seconds on default without touching the real property, and the trustee in a lessee bankruptcy will recognize the lessor's ownership because the unit is obviously not a fixture. In the US the same analysis runs through UCC section 1-203 (true lease vs. disguised sale) and section 9-505 (precautionary filings). Either way, register.

The commercial landlord claims a landlord lien on everything in the unit. Does Cyrano hardware survive that?

A landlord lien in most jurisdictions only reaches personal property of the tenant located at the premises, and is subordinate to a prior-perfected PPSA or UCC-1 security interest. As long as the lender or lessor registered before the tenant-landlord conflict crystallized, the Cyrano unit comes out with the secured party. The fact that the Cyrano unit is plainly portable and plainly not a fixture also avoids a secondary argument from the landlord that the device was 'installed' into the premises in a way that makes it part of the real property. Landlord can still make that argument for the DVR (because it is wired into walls), but not for the Cyrano unit.

Is there an actual recorded case applying the PPSA or UCC Article 9 to an AI edge camera device?

Not as of this writing. The case law on fixtures and security equipment runs through older fact patterns, hardwired alarm panels, rack-mounted NVRs, wired PoE switch infrastructure, and the odd integrated access-control keypad embedded in a door frame. There is no published decision yet that applies the affixation test to a modern HDMI-only AI edge box. Which is exactly why we wrote this page, because the classification for a device with this physical profile is unusually clean under the existing affixation test and we want the argument sitting on the internet in advance of the first contested filing.

🛡️CyranoEdge AI Security for Apartments
© 2026 Cyrano. All rights reserved.

How did this page land for you?

React to reveal totals

Comments ()

Leave a comment to see what others are saying.

Public and anonymous. No signup.